Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Forming an "Alliance," Part II: What's in a Name?

In Part I of this series, The Vicious Cycle of Shoes & Spinning Our Wheels, I shared how I came to really see the need for a unified organization that can advocate for feet and educate on how good it is to let our feet be feet. This would be a way to press back against the opposition that's built up over the years by those who believe shoes are so necessary to our daily living.

I floated the idea in November to my wife, obviously, and a barefooter that I trust very much: Barefoot Moe (Twitter: @BarefootMoe). He is a long-time barefooter who has seen it all and been asked on numerous occasions to don footwear when he felt like going barefoot. I asked him if this could even work. I definitely wanted to know if he saw a benefit to this -- if it really could make any difference compared to what he's experienced and seen over the last couple of decades. He thought it would and so we pressed forward.

MANY names surfaced as worthy candidates to identify this brand. The first was -- no kidding -- "People Encouraging Healthy Barefoot Living." If you make that long name an acronym, it becomes PEHBL, pronounced "pebble." Cute and catchy, but the full name was too long. No one would ever remember it and, quite frankly, it didn't really grasp the message we were looking for. Moe and I both thought that the name needed to be shorter and have more "umph." We considered using a strong word that showed we were many supporters brought together as one. We considered words like "coalition," "cooperation," "alliance" and "society." Some names that were floated were:
  • Go Barefoot
  • Barefoot Life
  • Barefoot People
  • The Cooperation for Barefoot Health
  • The Alliance for a Barefoot Life
They were all great names, but something never totally felt right about them. Finally, we settled on the word "alliance." It sends a message that, although we may all do our own thing, we're together behind this cause. Up sprouted the name "The Barefooting Alliance."

That was THE name for quite a while. I used that for most of the prep work prior to the "soft" launch. I made a Facebook Fan page for it. I set up a Twitter account. I explored domain names for it. Then, I had an epiphany a couple weeks before we went live.

Using the term "barefoot" was great for talking about going completely barefoot, but it's always troubled me that people use it when talking about wearing minimalist shoes. Since the organization would be supporting people who receive discrimination because of their minimalist shoes, using the term "barefooting" didn't seem quite right. Even calling minimalist footwear "minimalist" always seemed to send the wrong message, because there are boots out there that let a foot function more naturally than some flip flops.

The point of all this was to advocate for those who wanted their feet to be feet. The group will heavily promote going barefoot but leave open the window for those who just can't bring themselves to do it or find that footwear really is necessary for whatever reason.

I began exploring options for a completely new word to describe the state of allowing feet to function as they were first meant to, whether that be barefoot or in "minimalist" shoes. The term had to be all-inclusive, working just as well in describing going barefoot as a very flexible, thin-soled boot. A few words came to the fore:
  • First
  • Nature
  • Birth
  • Paleo
  • Core
Then, I stumbled onto the word "primal." I liked it because it was based on something being original and instinctual. It really resonated with me, but at the time it seemed like it could come across as too "caveman." I asked around on Twitter and Facebook for people to share the first thing that came to their minds when they heard that word. I got back responses like, "instinctual," "wild, raw, natural--from the very core of me," and "Origins, first ... prime. He was called Optimus Prime because he was #1, not because he was a caveman." The word really fit the concepts I mentioned earlier and accurately described the message we were going for: Letting feet be feet first. Prime.

So we almost had a finished name. I say "almost," because the name was still slightly different than what it is now. Until close to the very end, the group was the "Primal Foot Alliance," with three words instead of two. After some further reflection and comparison to the word "barefoot," we settled on the idea that the adjective should be "Primalfoot" as one word describing who we are as a group of people.

And so the name has remained "The Primalfoot Alliance." I think it works well. It accurately describes going barefoot and wearing "primal" footwear -- shoes that allow the feet to act as feet -- and avoids confusion about what a "minimalist" shoe is or how someone can run barefoot while wearing footwear.

What do you think of the name? Do you feel like it gets across the idea of letting feet be feet first without restrictive or gait-altering shoes? I welcome you to leave your comments below.

Next: Part III: The Complexity of a Simple Logo

Pebble photo: www.thenervousbreakdown.com

5 comments:

  1. "Go Barefoot" really works because it's a phrase everybody knows. Only YOU really know what "primal" means---everybody else (including me) will be wondering "Huh???" These minimalist shoes are yet another money-hungry gesture, perhaps best left to runners (like yourself) who may need some form of protection against foot strikes on the ground while running. This group should be, authentically, about GOING BAREFOOT, not "pretending" to go barefoot.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like the name. I feel that giving the group a name that isn't obvious inspires people to ask questions. The learning experiences that will follow these questions are arguably the strongest tool the barefoot movement has in the fight for non-discrimination. That's what the group is about right? Spreading awareness is the key to a better future.

    I think that minimalist footware has a place in the barefoot community. Whether it's used as a transition to bare feet, or as a last resort when traveling on dangerous footing, possibly at work, minimalist footware is really just a fresh look at the moccasin. These type of shoes encourage a "barefoot" gait, and an awareness of the ground beneath our feet. That, in my opinion, is a huge step forward, regardless of whether it fits into a purist mindset or not.

    Happy Feet,
    Shane

    ReplyDelete
  3. It takes as much practice walking "entirely" barefoot as it does while wearing something minimalist, plus the social jitters get a chance to wear off. You can't just go barefoot. It takes time for conditioning. Encouraging any kind of footwear appears to delay the problem. Only "bare"foot is barefoot.

    ReplyDelete
  4. i think naming an endeavor is often the hardest part, but you did a great job with this one for sure!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hmmm....other naming possibilities:

    "The Anti-Footwear League" (maybe too confrontational?)

    "Shoes are Boring so Let's Leave Them Home" (nah, too long)

    "Suddenly it's 1970... Again" (uh, too cryptic, probably will go right over the heads of anyone under a certain age)

    "The Voluntarily Shoeless Society" (well, does not sound as good as I thought)

    "The Sole-to-Ground Advocacy Group" (maybe not, shoes have soles too, may not work)

    "We Don't Need no Stinkin' Shoes!" (too sarcastic I guess)

    "Furgeddabout the flip-flops" (probably too confusing)

    "The Barefoot Walkers Anti-Discrimination Group" (too formal?)

    "The Shoeless and Civilized" (not sure about that one)

    "No Shoes, No Problem! (I've seen that one before in beach towns)

    "The Huck Finn Shoe-Haters Club" (way too retro?)


    On second thought, maybe PrimalFoot Alliance is good anough......

    ReplyDelete

Related from LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails