Author's Note: I've been debating with myself for the past few weeks about how I want to approach reviews on this blog. With such good reviews coming from a site as robust and well-maintained as Living Barefoot, I've been struggling with the idea that any review I write here would be redundant and irrelevant compared to theirs. Additionally, they have achieved a position that they can review products much earlier than myself. Except for my review of the Vivo Barefoot Dharmas (which I won in Living Barefoot's contest), I must pay for any shoes I would review and personally use, so the extent of my reviews is automatically limited. I've decided that I'm going to buy whichever shoes I want to buy and wear whichever shoes I want to wear. My "reviews" will be short and quick, covering what I see are the pros and cons. If a shoe company wishes to have me try out their footwear I'd be more than happy to do so, but I will leave the long reviews to Al and Tina over at Living Barefoot.I had the opportunity to start wearing my first two pair of “minimalist footwear” shoes nearly simultaneously.
The shoes in this review, the Aqua style of Vivo Barefoot shoes from
Terra Plana, arrived a few days after my Dharma-style shoes.
Style
The Aquas look like a very wide sneaker, almost hearkening back to the 80s. While not overly stylish, they work with any casual clothing and some "business-casual" attire as well.
Quality
Like I said of the Dharmas, it’s easy to tell that greater care went into making these shoes than your run-of-the-mill sneakers. From the sturdy materials, to the hand stitching, to the focus on impacting the environment as little as possible, these shoes are very nice.
Compared to standard shoes, the Aquas and Dharmas are much higher quality.
Cost
Like I said with the Dharmas, the price of these shoes is pretty steep. Had I not been given a significant discount code for these shoes (in the box with my Dharmas) I likely wouldn't have bought them. I would expect that these shoes would be more expensive than your average pair of sneakers because of their build quality, however $150 USD seems really high. I put Vivo Barefoot shoes in the same category as other "green" products: The price is prohibitive for encouraging widespread adoption.
I’ve got to think that you could find a high-quality sneaker with a thin sole for less. Granted, they may not have as much of a “barefoot” feel or be as kind to the environment, but your wallet would thank you.
Fit/Comfort
While the Aquas are still incredibly comfortable, I found that I needed to be careful how tightly I tied the laces. If they were too tight my feet didn’t feel as able to flex, move and breathe the way I wanted. In fact, following the first time that I wore them, the top of my right foot in line with the big toe had a very sore spot. After quite a bit of pain and worry over weather I'd given myself some kind of stress fracture somehow, I realized that the first loophole on the Aqua had been tight enough to create a very uncomfortable pressure point for a long period of time. I've since begun keeping the laces more lose to avoid such an issue, which has resolved the problem. Overall, I would say the Dharmas still feel a bit more comfortable than the Aquas because the Aquas are laced up.
Barefoot Sensation/Movement
Going barefoot so much before wearing minimalist shoes spoiled me. Nothing can replace the feeling of bare sole on the ground below, so I have to take a mental step back and review these on their merits: a flexible shoe with an ultra-thin, puncture-resistant sole.
The large toe box on the Aquas was certainly adequate enough to prevent my toes from feeling “confined.” The Aquas have so much space that I could almost make “fists with my toes” wearing them (ala Bruce Willis in the movie Die Hard) while the Dharmas afford much less luxury. For the barefoot enthusiast who wants a shoe with lots of wiggle room for their toes, this shoe is heaven.
Wearing the Aquas without the removable insole does help the foot feel as if it’s walking on the ground with bare feet. Vivo Barefoot shoes certainly remove the problem that many other shoes cause for our feet. There is no thick heel sole. There is no cushioning. They force the wearer to adjust his/her gait in order to avoid a hard heel strike, which can only relieve the amount of pressure going up through a person’s legs and into the rest of the body.
Interestingly enough, the removable insole in the Aquas feels softer and "squishier". While the Dharmas feel pretty firm with or without the insole, the Aquas feel much softer while using the “cushiony” insole. This might all be best explained with equations:
Dharmas:
- Shoe – Insole = Firm
- Shoe + Insole = Less Firm
Aquas:
- Shoe – Insole = Firmer
- Shoe + Insole = Least Firm
What I like best about both the Aquas and Dharmas is that my arches always felt much more free to flex compared to normal shoes. I was impressed at how much more movement the Vivo Barefoot shoes gave my feet overall. That makes me believe that these shoes are far healthier for my feet.
The Final Words
When shoes are necessary, I like the Terra Plana line of Vivo Barefoot shoes very much. The certainly feel better on the feet than a "normal" pair of shoes so long as the laces aren't too tight. The sticking point about them, however, is their price. In the end, if you are not concerned about the cost and/or you find that the high quality of materials and workmanship warrant it, the Aqua line of Vivo Barefoot shoes from Terra Plana is certainly worth a look and feel.